Compare
Deciding who should own a territory, and enforcing who does
eSpatial is built for the first: balancing sales territories across reps, modelling a realignment before you commit to it. MapLogics is built for the second: holding the boundaries the network agreed and answering, thousands of times a day, what happens at an address. Most organisations need one of those far more than the other.
Prices and features on this page were read from eSpatial's own site on September 3, 2026. If something has moved since, tell us at hello@maplogics.com and we will correct it.
What eSpatial is
Sales territory management and mapping, aimed at field sales organisations aligning reps to territories.
What it says it does, in its own terms:
- Create, realign, merge and close territories, with rep-specific assignment
- Automated territory optimization across six levels of sales organisation hierarchy
- Predictive scenario modelling and performance insights on the Advanced plan
- Route optimization, heat mapping, and gap and hotspot analysis
Published pricing
- Mapping Pro, $499/user/year, minimum 3 users, 0 rep territories
- Professional Territory Manager, $2,665/user/year, minimum 3 users, 100 rep territories
- Advanced Territory Manager, $4,999/user/year, minimum 3 users, 200 rep territories
- Salesforce integration $5,995, single sign-on $7,495, data connector $2,500, all as add-ons
What that works out at
Ours, not theirs. The arithmetic is shown so you can check it against the list above.
- Territory management starts on the Professional plan, and the minimum is three users, so the smallest published configuration that manages territories is 3 x $2,665 = $7,995 a year
Optimisation against enforcement
eSpatial's territory manager will propose an alignment: balance the workload across a rep hierarchy, model what happens if you move three counties, and show you the effect before you commit. That is a real problem and it is a hard one.
It is also not the problem a franchise network has. There, a territory is something a franchisee bought, and no software gets to propose moving it. What that network needs is for the boundary to be exactly what the agreement says, for a change to be visible and attributed, and for last March's map to still exist when somebody disputes a lead. That is what we built.
A useful test: if the answer to "who should own this area" is a negotiation you have already had, you want enforcement. If it is a question you are still asking, optimisation is worth paying for.
Per seat, with a minimum
eSpatial's published prices are per user per year with a three user minimum, and territory management starts on their Professional plan rather than their mapping plan. The smallest published configuration that manages territories is therefore three seats on that plan; the arithmetic is above, and the Salesforce integration is a separate one-off on top of it.
MapLogics is a flat monthly price with no per-seat charge and CRM integrations included on both plans, and the numbers are on the pricing page. That gap is real and it is also not the point: they are selling a different thing to a different buyer, and a sales operations team with a modelling problem will get more from their Advanced plan than from anything we sell at any price.
What we do not do
No territory optimisation. We will not propose where a boundary should go, and we do not model a realignment. That is deliberate: those need clean inputs about demand, capacity and travel that almost nobody has, and the output is a suggestion somebody senior overrules.
No rep hierarchy, no quota or performance analytics, no scenario modelling. If your territories exist to divide a sales target, most of what you need is in their product and not in ours.
When to choose eSpatial
These are real. A comparison page where the other product never wins has told you nothing except that we wrote it.
- You are balancing sales territories across a rep hierarchy, and want the software to propose the alignment rather than hold the one you agreed.
- Scenario modelling before a realignment is the thing you are buying.
- The people who need it are a named set of sales managers, so per-seat pricing fits how you think about it.
The honest way to decide
Point both at your own addresses. Ours answers a real one without an account on the free lookup, and the trial takes no card, so the comparison costs you an afternoon rather than a procurement cycle.
Where these claims came from
Read on September 3, 2026.